# Heart Equationby lipid-fatality

Math is way simpler to use than poetry~ Mehehehe...

Happy valentine's day, everyone!

----
Created with Google Chrome apps: Daum Equation Editor & Graph.tk
Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2012
Numbers are an amazing thing especially the things you can do with numbers, you can take two or more concepts in mathematics and joine them like taking positive and negative operations and puttings them on a coordiante system. Before I go into this I need to explain what some notations mean to get an idea of how big the numbers get or how they are represented. Exponentiation is obviously repeated Multiplication but the fourth operation Tetration is the next operation up and is repeated Exponentiation for example 7 Tetrated to 10 would be 7^7^7^7^7^7^7, 149 Tetrated to 6 would be 149^149^149^149^149^149, 5 Tetration to 11 would be 5^5^5^5^5^5^5^5^5^5^5 and 7 Tetration to 3 would be 7^7^7 so imagine what other numbers would be, Pentation would be the next operation up from Tetration or repeated Tetration, there would be at least as much difference between Tetration and Pentation as there would be Exponentiation and Tetration, I had to say these first.

It just gets confusing when tracking the notations levels and amounts. In a weird sense this leads to a recursive paradox because you end up first: having layers of mathematics as you get with higher numbers the first layers being regular numbers like 1, 2, 3, 4, then you have operations like Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation, Tetration, then you have notation levels like a notation so high that you need an exponent for that, then a Tetration of operations, a Pentation of operations untill you get into another layer you could call the poetic layer of mathematics where you deal with msotly words and almost never deal with actual numbers. From these four layers you could take this patturn and say instead of 4, 10 or 27 mathematical layers have a Tetration of mathematical layers, then a Tetration of operations of these layers untill you get into the peotic realm, this would make a second set of mathematical layers or a hyper layer and this could continue untill you get into 10, 20 or 10,000,000,000 hyper layers of mathematics starting a recursive paradox of mathematical concepts and higher and higher layers and representative notations. This would almost cancell out mathematics as we know it because the recursive paradox would be beyond number or proper quantities and leak into the peotic descriptions of them.Ironically almsot all of this depends on a lienar coordiante ssytem of mathematics and this could be applied in a 2D, 3D, 10D or a coordiante ssytem with a Tetration of dimentions meaning it invovles so many dimentions that it needs several layers of exponent, then it could be in a coordiante ssytem that invovles a Pentation of dimentions, a Hexation, a Hectation, a Yattation, a Tredation, a Trigination, a Nongentation, a Eightation, a Googolnonaplexation or a Treebation of dimentions, what could be determined from the joined axises of so many dimentions that it needs a Treebation or so many dimentions that it requires a peotic array of numbers transcending real numbers. What was just described would invole a second layer of mathematical dimentions because it is now a set of dimentions each a coordinate ssytem that is a positive and negative array of operations. The dimentions just described could have negative numbers making this a form of altra dimention because it would be an exist with a positive and negative side. This could go into not just one altra dimention but so many altra dimentions that they require a Tetration, Zettation and Zalation of dimentions bacause there are so many to make coordinates with. This would make a third layer of dimentions now imagine based on this building up that there were so many layers of dimentions that they needed a Tetration, Xappation or a peotic array and say that the regular coordinate system of positive and negative operations was one super layer of mathematical dimentions and what was just done was a second super layer of mathematical dimentions. Then create another super layer from that, after all of this take what was done so far, what number would be at the end, not what peotic array, operation but actual number as in just 3, 6, 9, 7, what actual number would be at the end of all of this take that number and what was done in this whole explaination and continue it for as many more steps as the highest number and continue that for as many more steps as the highest number from that and continue that for that many steps and take this whole thing and continue it for a recursive number of times.

Eventually you get stuck because you just keep making each new number a product of the number of steps from the highest number before that and that would be from the number before that, this would simply create a strong of recursion and would need some kind of recursive freedom to get away from this patturn and make other levels of recursion from these. What was described would be the first level of recursion but the second level could be take the patturn of all the numbers in a sequence so and advance that for ([ Take the patturn that was done so far and project it for [ Take the patturn of the numbers descibed before and project then for [ Take the patturn of the numbers decribed before and project them for [ Take what was done on the patturn of numbers before and project them for that many times more. ] many times more. ] many times more. ] number of times more ]take what is represnted in the levels of parenthesis and extend that for that many peranthesi levels what the number happens to be in any sequence like this project it to that conclusion. ) numbers of steps more and what number would you get after that. What was just done could be the second step breaking a simple recursive line and there could be more steps after these. A possible third step although this would not be exact could be take the patturn of the numbers before and continue the patturn for {step2...to steo 2....step 2} continue the patturn so far for {step2...to steo 2....step 2} continue the patturn so far for {step2...to steo 2....step 2}...........for that number of steps more {step2...to steo 2....step 2} this is what step 3 would roughly be. Thank you for this.
Featured By Owner Feb 11, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
OMG This is art!

### Details

Submitted on
February 11, 2012
Image Size
29.3 KB
Resolution
1249×364